Every week it seems there's a new update in the ongoing legal tussle between Airbnb, the state, and the city's landlords and tenants. But the latest decision seems like it was a bigger deal than most: a Manhattan judge ruled that a woman couldn't be evicted from her FiDi apartment even though she'd knowingly been violating her lease (and turning a profit) by renting the place out on the home-sharing site.

Seems like a huge victory for renters hoping to make a little extra cash, right?

Well, maybe.

The judge ruled that the oft-cited state law against short-term sublets--the "Multiple Dwelling Law"--is meant to keep landlords and property owners in line, not tenants, and that renting out a room for profit isn't the kind of "noncurable" offense generally used to justify an eviction.

But the judge also found that once a landlord tells a tenant to stop Airbnb-ing their apartment, the tenant is obligated to comply (and the defendant in this particular case has long since stopped listing her apartment), so this isn't exactly a free ride for would-be Airbnb hosts.

Meanwhile, the company itself says it's "pleased" with the decision, and one longtime Housing Court attorney told the New York Post that the ruling is "good for tenants." Though it's not the final rule for landlords, and doesn't necessarily set a precedent for other courts, for now, at least, renters hoping to make a quick buck off a weekend guest can breathe a little easier.